SA No. 359 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI SA No. 359 of 2025 1. Syed Yusuf(Died),1.S.Nasima Bee W/o. Syed Yusuf(late), Muslim Street, udaiyarkudi, Kattumannarkoil-Taluk, Cuddalore District 2. S. Syed Valiyullah S/o. Syed Yousuf, (late), Muslim St, Udayarkudi, Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore Dt. 3. Anargali D/o. Syed Yousuf, (late), Muslim St, Udayarkudi, Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore Dt. 4. S. Syed Ali S/o. Syed Yousuf, (late), Muslim St, Udayarkudi, Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore Dt. 5. Thairunnisha D/o. Syed Yousuf, (late), Muslim St, Udayarkudi, Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore Dt. 6. S. Askar Ali S/o. Syed Yousuf, (late), Muslim St, Udayarkudi, Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore Dt. 7. S. Kamurinisha D/o. Syed Yousuf, (late), Muslim St, Udayarkudi, Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore Dt. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 359 of 2025 Appellant(s) Vs 1. Thagirunissa W/o. Ussainkhan, Muslim Street, Udaiyarkudi, Kattumannarkoil-Taluk, Cuddalore District Respondent(s) SA No. 359 of 2025 PRAYER To set aside the judgment and decree as made in O.S.No.14/2008 dated 03-03- 2017 on the file of the District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Kattumannarkoil as confirmed in A.S.No.55/2020 dated 31-07-2023 on the file of the II Additional District Court at Chidambaram and thus render justice. SA No. 359 of 2025 For Appellant(s): MR.M.Arumugam For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Manokaran ORDER This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 03-03-2017 passed by the District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Kattumannarkoil in O.S.No.14/2008 confirmed by the II Additional District Court at Chidambaram in A.S.No.55/2020 dated 31-07-2023. 2. one appeared for the appellant. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent/plaintiff submit that possession of the suit property was taken over by the respondent/plaintiff and Execution Petition proceedings was terminated. 4. The above submission is recorded. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 359 of 2025 5. However, a perusal of docket sheet in the second appeal shows that the appellant counsel sought adjournment for three hearings and not pursuing the case further. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, due to non prosecution and in the light of the subsequent development before the executing Court, this second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No Costs. Pending petition(s), if any, is/are closed. 02-02-2026 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1. The District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate Court at Kattumannarkoil. 2. The II Additional District Court at Chidambaram. 3. The Section Officer, V. R Section, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA No. 359 of 2025 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pbl SA No. 359 of 2025 02-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis