SHASHIKANT SHARMA ALIAS SHASHIKANT MISHRA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./57/2026 · 2026-04-29
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7540 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7540 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:12624 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.57 of 2026
------ Shashikant Sharma @ Shashikant Mishra, aged about 35 years, son of Chandra Bhushan Mishra, Resident of Village-Majhigawan, P.O. & P.S.-Rohtas, Dist.-Rohtas, Bihar.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.08 Dated- 29-04-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.88 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Section 364, 302 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code & Section 27 of Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner extended his assistance with the co-accused person in disposing of the looted vehicle whose driver was killed by the co-accused persons after abduction. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioner of abduction or committing murder of the driver of the vehicle concerned. It is also submitted that no T.I.P. was conducted in respect of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is next submitted that the co-accused persons have been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 13.09.2022 in B.A. No.7089 of 2022, B.A. No.7657 of 2022 and B.A. No.7597 of 2022. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.08.2025 as is evident from para-08 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-II, Garhwa in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.88 of 2022 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 29/04/2026 Abhiraj/