2026:JHHC:12811 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 1273 of 2026 Rekha Bibi ….. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opposite Party ----- CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: Mr. R. R. S. Singh, Advocate For the State: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P For the Informant: Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate ----- 08/30.04.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 103(1), 351(2), 352 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. The petitioner had no intention to kill the deceased. The alleged incident took place during free fight between the parties. The petitioner is a lady and is in judicial custody since 30.04.2025. Hence, she may be given the privilege of regular bail. 4. Learned A.P.P as well as learned counsel for the informant while opposing the petitioner’s prayer for bail, jointly submit that there is direct allegation against the petitioner that she, by means of ‘Hasua’, assaulted the deceased, as a result of which, he succumbed to the injury. Under the said circumstances, the petitioner may not be given the privilege of bail. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering that there is direct allegation against the petitioner that she assaulted the deceased by means of ‘Hasua’ resulting his death, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Rajmahal P.S. Case No. 147/2025. 2026:JHHC:12811 6. The prayer for bail of the above named petitioner is accordingly rejected. Satish/- (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)