Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7530 (AP)

SRI KOVIRI MARK v. PEEYUSH KUMAR

CC/3938/2024 · 2026-08-06

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010439222024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3938/2024 Between: 1. SRI KOVIRI MARK, S/O KOVIRI PRASAD AGE.ABOUT 48 YEARS,OCC PROPRIETOR. AP R/O 65-4- 438/2,NAKKAVANIPALEM.OPP ZINC HANUMAN TEMPLE NEW GAJUWAKA,VISAKHAPATNAM.AP O/O TEMPORARY RESIDING AT PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, 522237. VELAGAPUDI,(V)AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT- 2. SHRI MUDAVATU M NAYAK, ,THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT AND FISHERIES (FISH)DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT,AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SHRI DOLA SANKAR, THE COMMISSIONER,OF FISHERIES, PORANKI BANDAR ROAD A.P. VIJAYAWADA. 4. DR B R AMBEDKAR, ,THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR VIZAYANAGARAM . DISTRICT . 5. N NIRMALA KUMARI, ,THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES, VIZAYANAGARAM . DISTRICT, ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly, and deliberately of violating the Order dated 05-01-2024 passed in W.P.No.23483 of 2023 in the interest of justice, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISHNA RAO M Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. N SIVA REDDY 3. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.23483 of 2023 on 05.01.2024, wherein this Court passed the following order: “….In view of the order passed by this Court and after hearing the submissions of learned counsel on both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to complete the verification process within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order..…” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent/contemnors furnished a copy of Letter in Rc. No.550/A/2016, dated 31.07.2026, wherein the details of the payments made by the respondents in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court are mentioned below: Sl.N o. Name of the firm Bill Numbe r Payment reference/UTR No. & Date Payment status Amnount released (in Rs.) 1. M/s.Rayal Enterprises, Visakhapatna m 22025- 128088 6 /XUTR/RBISH00488255606,dat e:31.03.2026 Success 33,18,400/- 2. 2025- 613794 RBI12402567575643 Date:27.08.2025 Success 9,69,000/- Total 42,87,400/- 3. Recording the above instructions, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 07.08.2026 RJS THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA C.C.No.3938 of 2024 07.08.2026 RJS