HANDIQUE AND BARUWA ENTERPRISE PVT. LTD., v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.
WP(C)/2431/2024 · 2026-06-07
Kaushik Goswami
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7529 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7529 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010092102024
2026:GAU-AS:7928
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2431/2024 HANDIQUE AND BARUWA ENTERPRISE PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT HANCHARA GOHAIN GAON, SIMALUGURI MOUZA, TEOK, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM, BEING REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, SRI KARANJYOTI HANDIQUE, S/O- SR. DHRUBA JYOTI HANDIQUE, R/O- KOTHIALHUNDA GAON, P.O. AND P.S. SAPEKHATI, DIST.
SIVASAGAR, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI.
2:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN HAVING ITS HEADQUARTERS AT SECTOR-10 DWARKA NEW DELHI-110075 NEW DELHI.
3:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI NRDFI HOUSE 4TH FLOOR GS ROAD DISPUR GHY-06 ASSAM REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR.
4:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (NHIDCL) PTI BUILDING 4
Page No.# 2/3 PARLIAMENT STREET SAMAD MARG AREA NEW DELHI-110001.
5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER JORHAT DIST. JORHAT PIN- 785001.
6:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER/ BRANCH OFFICER (LAND ACQUISITION BRANCH) JORHAT DISTRICT- JORHAT PIN- 7800 ASSAM (COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT 1956).
7:THE CIRCLE OFFICER TEOK REVENUE CIRCLE TEAOK DIST. JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B SHARMA, MR S SHARMA,MR. M HASSAN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., SC, NHIDC,SC, NHAI,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 08.06.2026 None appeared for the petitioner on call. Mr. R K Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 is present. Despite the matter being called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on call, though the names of the learned counsels for the petitioner have been reflected in the cause list today. In view of the above, the instant writ petition, stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Page No.# 3/3
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant