Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7528 (AP)

B KIRAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/8250/2026 · 2026-08-10

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010150072026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 8250/2026 Between: 1. B KIRAN KUMAR, S/O LATE B. KASI RAO AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC MECHANIC GRADE-LL, E. 775823 O/O THE TEKKALI DEPOT, APSRTC, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. R/O.SRIKAKULAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TRANSPORT AND ROADS AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CUM VICE-CHAIRMAN, PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R.DISTRICT. 520001 3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATION, APSRTC, PNBS, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R DISTRICT. 520001 4. THE DEPOT MANAGER, TEKKALI DEPOT, APSRTC, TEKKALI SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.532201 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tobe to issue a Writ or Order more in the nature of 2 Mandamus in declaring the action of the respondents in not granting notional seniority to the petitioner from 23-02-2004 instead of 01-07- 2009 and not extending the benefit of the judgment dated 06-02-2024 passed in W.P No.29945 of 2011 and W.P.No.30263 of 2011 to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents to grant notional seniority to the petitioner from 23-02-2004 on par with his batch mates with all consequential benefits including seniority, promotion, pay fixation and attendant benefits, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider and extend the benefit of notional seniority to the petitioner from 23-02-2004 onwards on par with his batch mates in terms of the order dated 06-02-2024 in W.P.No.29945 of 2011 and W.PNo.30263 of 2011, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 31.03.2026 in I.A.No.1 of 2026 in W.P.No.8250 of 2026 and dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHI KAMESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SRINIVASA PRASAD SC For APSRTC 2. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.8250 of 2026 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date: 11.08.2026 chs 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 98 WRIT PETITION No.8250 of 2026 Dated: 11.08.2026 chs