Oyela (Ojala) Padma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/22263/2026 · 2026-08-06
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7527 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7527 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010411112026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE 7 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22263/2026 Between:
1. OYELA (OJALA) PADMA, , W/O. MIIKA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.NO.20/548 LAKSHMANARAOPURAM, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT
521001. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT-521001. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ROBERTSONPET (R PET) POLICE STATION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT
4. ORUGANTI LALITA KAMESWARI, W/O.RADHA KRISHNA SHARMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.NO.50, CHINA TUMMIDI VILLAGE, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT 521324
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members calling to the police station and threatening to settle the issue with the 4th respondent as illegal and arbitrary and violation of Articles 19, 21 of Constitution of India and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22263/2026 (OJALA) PADMA, , W/O. MIIKA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.NO.20/548-14-2, RTC COLONY, LAKSHMANARAOPURAM, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL
HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ROBERTSONPET (R PET) POLICE STATION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521101.
RUGANTI LALITA KAMESWARI, W/O.RADHA KRISHNA SHARMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.NO.50, CHINA TUMMIDI VILLAGE, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the erty of the petitioner and his family members calling to the police station and threatening to settle the issue with the 4th respondent as illegal and arbitrary and violation of Articles 19, 21 of Constitution of India and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (OJALA) PADMA, , W/O. MIIKA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, 2, RTC COLONY, LAKSHMANARAOPURAM, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT - ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI AT THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ROBERTSONPET (R PET) POLICE
521101. RUGANTI LALITA KAMESWARI, W/O.RADHA KRISHNA SHARMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O.D.NO.50, CHINA TUMMIDI VILLAGE, BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT - ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the erty of the petitioner and his family members calling to the police station and threatening to settle the issue with the 4th respondent as illegal and arbitrary and violation of Articles 19, 21 of Constitution of India and
2
consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the personal liberty of the petitioner by calling the petitioners to the police station IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant interim direction directing the 3rdrespondent not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 4threspondent by calling to the police station, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22263 of 2026
ORDER:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J
Dated: 07.08.2026 MDP