Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7526 (RAJ)

ASOO S/O RUKAMVEER SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/127/2026 · 2026-05-11

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:19754-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 127/2026 Asoo S/o Rukamveer Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 45, Near Lal Tanki, Model Town, Panipat, Haryana, Presently Residing At Ward No. 11, Neem Nagar, Reengus, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Raj. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Traffic Unit Rajasthan Jaipur. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Sikar. 5. SHO, Police Station Reengus, District Sikar. 6. Roshan S/o Yudhharam, R/o Bhopatpura, Tehsil Reengus, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhruv Atri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary,GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma and Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Dalip, SI, P.S. Ringus, District Sikar Ms. Sunita, FC No. 1377 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 11/05/2026 1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner–Asoo. 2. Today the concerned SHO has produced the corpus before us. Admittedly, the corpus is minor aged about 15 years. [2026:RJ-JP:19754-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-127/2026] 3. We have interacted with the corpus and she has firmly stated before us that she wants to go with her father-Asoo, who is present in the Court. 4. Considering the statement made by the corpus before us and also considering the fact that she is minor and below 18 years of age, we permit the corpus to live with her father. Custody of the corpus is handed over to her father, who is present in the Court and identified by the counsel for the petitioner as well as the concerned SHO. 5. The concerned SHO is directed to ensure that no harm should be caused to the corpus by anyone while going with her father. 6. In that view of the matter, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Ritu/4