Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:12640 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2522 of 2026
------ Md. Irshad Ansari, aged about 27 years, Son of Late Md. Kamruddin Ansari, Resident of Village –Hussain Nagar, Gumla, P.O. and P.S. –Gumla, District –Gumla.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate
: Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. V.K. Vashistha, Spl. P.P. ------
Order No.04 Dated- 29.04.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.401 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 21(b)/22(b) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in illegal trade of Narcotics Drugs like brown sugar and 24 gram of brown sugar was recovered from the possession of the petitioner which comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.12.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 13 of the bail application. It is then submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted in this case but no witness has been examined so far. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Gumla, in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No.401 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
29.04.2026
Sonu/