SAROJ MALLICK @ SAROJ KUMAR MALLICK v. STATE OF ODISHA
ABLAPL/2597/2026 · 2026-04-22
V Narasingh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7523 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7523 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 2597 of 2026
Saroj Mallick @ Saroj Kumar Mallick
….
Petitioner
Mr. B.P. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. P.K. Ray, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 22.04.2026
01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 170/2026 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C.(City), Cuttack, arising out of CRRI P.S. Case No.41/2026 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 351(2)/ 74/ 296/ 115(2) / 132 / 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the FIR has been instituted against Petitioner, on extraneous
consideration. Hence, he may be protected by pre-arrest bail.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for pre-arrest bail, inter alia, referring to the allegations relating to Section 132 of BNSS.
5. Taking into account the nature of allegations and punishment prescribed, it is directed that on p. 2 surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper.
6. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation.
7. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Jina