BISNU MANDAL ALIAS BISHNU KUMAR MANDAL ALIAS JHARI MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11961/2025 · 2026-04-30
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7520 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7520 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:12845 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11961 of 2025
Bisnu Mandal @ Bishnu Kumar Mandal @ Jhari Mandal
son of Beni Mandal
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand …
… Opp. Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. PP.
---
05/30.04.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Maniyadih P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025 for the offences registered under Sections 111(2) (b)/ 317(2)/ 318(4)/ 319(2)/336(3)/338/340(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023 and section 66(B)/66(C)/66(D) of the Information Technology Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Dhanbad.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the allegation one mobile and one SIM card has been recovered from the petitioner and there is one victim. He submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 14.09.2025. He submits that similarly situated co-accused Sanjay Kumar Mandal has been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 23.03.2026 in B.A. No. 12015 of 2025.
4.
Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer. However, aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner having no criminal antecedent and the fact that co-accused has been granted bail as stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Dhanbad in connection with Maniyadih P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025, on the following conditions:
( 2026:JHHC:12845 ) 2
(i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
6. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
7. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 30.04.2026 Uploaded on: 01.05.2026 Binit/