HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32240 of 2026 Court No. - 65 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Udit Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Imran Khan, learned AGA for the State-respondent. 3. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 078 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 131, 103(1), 115(2), 118(1) BNS & Sections 4 and 25 Arms Act, Police Station Singhwali Ahir, District Baghpat, during pendency of the trial in the court below. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that however it is a case in which one person died and two persons Kartik and Boby sustained injuries and as per allegation applicant and others involved in commission of the present crime but entire allegations made against the applicant are totally false. 5. He further submitted that from the statements of the alleged injured persons it reflect according to them applicant and co-accused Sajid were the prime accused who inflicted knife injuries to the deceased but from the record it reflects, injured Boby did not sustain any injury and even injured Kartik sustained only simple injury and therefore, their statements prima facie appear to be doubtful. 6. He further submitted that applicant is innocent and he did not participate in the instant crime. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhananjai Rai, Udit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suhail .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. He further submitted that applicant is having no previous criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 6.3.2026 i.e. for last more than six months. 8. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that however, there are several accused in the instant case but applicant and co- accused Sajid appear to be prime accused who inflicted knife injuries to the deceased and at this stage, statements of injured witnesses cannot be disbelieved. 9. He further submitted that even post mortem report also corroborates the statements of injured witnesses. 10. He further submitted that therefore, instant bail application may be dismissed. 11. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 12. It reflects applicant is named in the FIR alongwith others and as per allegation he alongwith others made assault due to which one person died and two persons sustained injuries. 13. From the statements of the alleged injured persons it reflect, applicant and co-accused Sajid were the prime accused who inflicted knife injuries to the deceased. The statements of injured witnesses also find corroboration from the post mortem report. 14. Further, however it reflects, injured Boby did not sustain any injury but injured Kartik sustained injury though minor in nature, therefore, it cannot be said that he is not the injured of the present case. Considering this fact at least statement of injured witness-Kartik cannot be disbelieved, at this stage and therefore, prima facie, it reflects, applicant and co-accused Sajid were the prime accused. 15. Further, in the present matter applicant is in jail only since March, 2026. 16. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case discussed above, in view of this Court, applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. 17. Accordingly, the instant bail application stands rejected. BAIL No. 32240 of 2026 2 18. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. September 17, 2026 Ankita BAIL No. 32240 of 2026 3 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad