M S ASHLESHA CORPORATION LTD THR ITS DIRECTOR SRI NARAYAN MAHTO v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ITS DEPUTY DIRECTOR
W.P.(Cr.)/267/2024 · 2026-04-29
Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7518 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7518 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:12497
Page | 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.). No. 267 of 2024 --------- 1.M/s Ashlesha Corporation Limited, a Company registered under the Companies Act 1956, through its Director Sri Narayan Mahto, aged about 54 years, son of Late Sukul Mahto, having its Regd. office at Hotel Le Lac, Line Tank Road, P.O Sukhdeonagar, P.S.Kotwali, District Ranchi (Jharkhand) 834001. 2.Binay Prakash, S/o Late Ram Chandra Prasad, Age about 60 Years, R/o Prakash Kunj, Booty Road, P.O. Bariatu, P.S. Sadar, Ranchi (Jharkhand) 834009. 3.Rita Prakash, Wife of Binay Prakash, aged about 55 years, R/o Prakash Kunj, Booty Road, P.O.-Bariatu, P.S.- Sadar, Ranchi (Jharkhand) 834009.
4.M/s Binay Prakash (HUF), through Binay Prakash (Karta) of Hindu Undivided Family, S/o Late Ram Chandra Prasad, Age about 60 years, R/o Prakash Kunj, Booty Road, P.O.-Bariatu, P.S.-Sadar, Ranchi (Jharkhand)-
834009.
… … Petitioners Versus Directorate of Enforcement, through its Deputy Director, having its Office at Kaushalya Chamber-II, Pe Pee Compound, P.O.-G.P.O., P.S. –Hindpiri, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand)
… … Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ----------
For the Petitioners
: Ms. Sonal Jaiswal, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate
Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advocate ---------- 06/Dated: 29th April, 2026
1. The case has been listed under the heading for orders (withdrawal of the case), which has been listed on the strength of Mention Memo filed on behalf of petitioner.
2. Ms. Sonal Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction has submitted that she does not want to press this application.
2026:JHHC:12497
Page | 2
3. Such submission has been made in presence of learned counsel for the respondent.
4. In view of such submission, the instant application stands dismissed as not pressed and as such disposed of.
5. Pending Interlocutory Application, stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 29th April, 2026 Alankar/-