RAHUL DAS @ RAHUL KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2763/2026 · 2026-04-30
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7517 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7517 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:12816] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2763 of 2026
------ Rahul Das @ Rahul Kumar Das, aged about 29 years, Son of Sahendra Das @ Sahendra Kumar Das, Resident of Vill- Datmi, P.O. Baluri, P.S.- Hunterganj, Dist- Chatra. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Amrita Kumar, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-03 Dated:-30-04-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Khalari P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 118(2), 109(1), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 111, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner fired upon the police party and one bullet hit the hawaldar namely Ram Sarekh Sharma and drove away. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner came to the place of occurrence to collect levy from the coal company and D.O. holders as well as contractors. It is also submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and though the petitioner has not been put under T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-4 of the supplementary affidavit yet charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been arrested merely on the basis of suspicion. It is next submitted that no witness has been examined in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.09.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be
released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Ranchi in connection with Khalari P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 30.04.2026 Saroj/