APHC010197822003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6819/2003 Between: 1. S.SUNEEL KUMAR REDDY, S/O. S.KOTA RANGA REDDY R/O. TEACHERS COLONY, BEHIND RAILWAY STATION, ULAVAPADU, ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVT OF A P DIST EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PRAKASAM DISTRICT, REP BY ITS DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER PRAKASAM DISTRICT ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. DASARI ADIVAIAH MEMORIAL AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT ULAVAPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction or Writ particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring the Memo R.C.No.2209/C4/2000 dt.19.11.2002 issued by the 1st Respondent in so far as not extending the regular Salary in the time scale of pay of Rs.3750-7650 to the Writ Petition with effect from the date of absorption into the grant-in-aid post i.e., 1.7.2000 is illegal and arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondent to extend the time Scales of pay to the petitioner with effect from 1.7.2000 with all consequential benefits including the arrears of Salary and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 8879 OF 2003 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to extend the scale of pay Rs.3750-7650 with immediate effect and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 26920 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for final hearing of the Writ Petition and pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2004(WPMP 91346 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Though the matter was adjourned on 10.07.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 24.07.2026. Even on that day there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today when the matter is called, learned counsel for the petitioner requested time. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 07.08.2026 RSD 4 151 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6819/2003 Dated: 07.08.2026 RSD