Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7510 (KAR)

SMT. PARVATHAMMA v. SRI. C M SUBBRAMANI

WP/6345/2026 · 2026-03-09

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13996 WP No. 6345 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6345 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. PARVATHAMMA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS D/O LATE MUNIYAMMA R/AT D NO. 2/319 MEL, SOODAPURAM BELATHUR POST, HOSUR TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT TAMILNADU 635124. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PALLAVA R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. C M SUBBRAMANI MAJOR S/O SRI. C. G. MUNISWAMY. 2. SRI PERUMAIAH MAJOR S/O SRI CHANNAPPA. 3. SRI CHINNANNA MAJOR S/O CHANNAPPA. 4. SRI RAJENDRA MAJOR S/O SRI M A SUBRAMANI Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13996 WP No. 6345 of 2026 5. SRI PALANI MAJOR S/O SRI M A SUBRAMANI 6. SRI SRINIVASA MAJOR S/O LATE SRI.UDDANDAPPA 7. SRI. U SUBRAMANI MAJOR S/O LATE SRI UDDANDAPPA 8. SRI S GOVINDARAJ S/O LATE SRI UDDANDAPPA SINCE DEAD REP. BY LRS. 9. SMT. SUDHA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS W/O LATE GOVINDARAJU 10. KUM. TEJASWINI AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS D/O LATE GOVINDARAJU 11. KUM. UMA AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS D/O LATE GOVINDARAJU R11 BEING MINOR IS REP. BY HER MOTHER SMT. SUDHA 12. SMT. LEELAVATHI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS D/O SHRI U SUBRAMANI R1 TO R12 ARE R/AT CHAMBENAHALLI, DOMMASANDRA POST SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13996 WP No. 6345 of 2026 13. SRI. M JAYAN AGED ABOUT 41 YEAR S/O SRI M GOPI R/AT NO.100 SUSHEELA ROAD DODDAMAVALLI, BANGALORE-560 004. 14. SRI K VENKATESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O SRI GOPALAKRISHNA RAO R/AT NO.4, CIRCULAR STREET SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027. 15. SRI VENKATAMMA MAJOR W/O M SUBRAMANI R/AT CHAMBENAHALLI, DOMMASANDRA POST SARJAPUR HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK 16. SMT. LAKSHAMAMMA MAJOR W/O LATE PERUMALAIAH@ THANGAVELU R/AT CHANBENAHALLI, DOMMASANDRA POST SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK. 17. SRI VELU MAJOR R/AT CHAMBENAHALLI DOMMASANDRA POST SARJAPURA HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13996 WP No. 6345 of 2026 APPROPRIATE WRIT DIRECTING THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANEKAL TO EXPEDITIOUSLY CONDUCT TRIAL AND DISPOSE THE OS NO. 1052/2007 PENDING ON ITS FILE WITHIN 01 YEAR FROM THE DATE OF PASSING OF THE SAID DIRECTION BY THIS HONBLE COURT, ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs: a) Issue appropriate Writ directing the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C, Anekal to expeditiously conduct trial and dispose the O.S. No. 1052 / 2007 pending on its file within 01 year from the date of passing of the said direction by this Hon'ble Court; Annexure: A, b) Pass any other or further Orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13996 WP No. 6345 of 2026 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as per their ranking before the Trial Court in the Original Suit. 3. The plaintiffs filed a suit in O.S.No.1052/2007 before the Trial Court seeking the relief of declaration of title. Despite the lapse of about 18 years, the suit has not yet been disposed of. On an earlier occasion, the petitioner had approached this Court in W.P.No.8997/2021. This Court, by order dated 17.08.2021, passed the following order: “However, it would suffice for this Court to dispose of this petition observing that the detailed guidelines have been issued for expeditious disposal of the older matters and the civil court must take every such measure as would be necessary for compliance with such directions. The petition stands disposed of accordingly.” 4. In view of the above circumstances, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13996 WP No. 6345 of 2026 5. The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible, and in any event not later than eighteen (18) months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, provided there is no order of stay of the said proceedings in any Court of law. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11