Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7510 (AP)

YADLAPALLI PRIYANKA v. Union of India

WP/18375/2026 · 2026-08-04

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010343722026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 5 PRESENT:THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18375/2026 Between: 1. YADLAPALLI PRIYANKA, W/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO.304, MYHOME APARTMENTS, CHANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR. 2. YADLAPALLI DURGA MANI KARTHIK,, S/O PRIYANKA, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN, MOTHER SMT. YADLAPALLI APARTMENTS, CHANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR. 1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI 2. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REP. BY CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, INTEGRATED OFFICE COMPLEX, SECTOR 110077. 3. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REP. BY REGIONAL OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE, SECOND AND THIRD FLOORS, STALIN CENTRE, MG ROAD, BESIDE MANORAMA HOTEL, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA 4. AP STATE COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 2 TO 5TH FLOORS, NILADRI TOWERS, SRI RAM NAGAR, 6T BATALLION ROAD, ATMAKURU VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 5. APEAPCET 2026, REP. BY CONVENOR, JAWAHARLAL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY, GROUND FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, KAKINADA, AP W.P.No.18375 of 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18375/2026 PRIYANKA, W/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO.304, MYHOME APARTMENTS, CHANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR. YADLAPALLI DURGA MANI KARTHIK,, S/O PRIYANKA, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN, MOTHER SMT. YADLAPALLI PRIYANKA R/O FLAT NO.304, MY HOME APARTMENTS, CHANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER(S) AND UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SASTRI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-11000 BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REP. BY CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, INTEGRATED OFFICE COMPLEX, SECTOR - 23, PHASE - I, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REP. BY REGIONAL OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE, SECOND AND THIRD S, STALIN CENTRE, MG ROAD, BESIDE MANORAMA HOTEL, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA-520002. AP STATE COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 2 TO 5TH FLOORS, NILADRI TOWERS, SRI RAM NAGAR, 6T BATALLION ROAD, ATMAKURU VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503. APEAPCET 2026, REP. BY CONVENOR, JAWAHARLAL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY, GROUND FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, KAKINADA, AP- 533003 RC,J W.P.No.18375 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI PRIYANKA, W/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O FLAT NO.304, MYHOME YADLAPALLI DURGA MANI KARTHIK,, S/O PRIYANKA, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS, REP. BY ITS NATURAL GUARDIAN, MOTHER PRIYANKA R/O FLAT NO.304, MY HOME ...PETITIONER(S) UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, EDUCATION BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REP. BY CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION, INTEGRATED OFFICE I, DWARAKA, NEW DELHI - CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, REP. BY REGIONAL OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE, SECOND AND THIRD S, STALIN CENTRE, MG ROAD, BESIDE MANORAMA AP STATE COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, 2 TO 5TH FLOORS, NILADRI TOWERS, SRI RAM NAGAR, 6T BATALLION ROAD, ATMAKURU VILLAGE, APEAPCET 2026, REP. BY CONVENOR, JAWAHARLAL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY, GROUND FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE RC,J W.P.No.18375 of 2026 2 6. DR K L PRASAD PUBLIC SCHOOL, REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT/ SECRETARY, J.K.C. COLLEGE ROAD, GUNTUR-522006. 7. THE PRINCIPAL, DR. K. L. PRASAD PUBLIC SCHOOL, J.K.C. COLLEGE ROAD, GUNTUR-522006. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order, or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing marks memo by reducing the marks from 23 to 8 in Physics Theory subject in Class XII examination 2026 without being applied for revaluation by the 2nd petitioner and not issuing corrected marks memo by in correcting 23 marks in Physics Theory subject in Class XII examination 2026 is arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to issue a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to issue a correct marks memo by incorporating correct marks of 23 in Physics Theory Subject with a positional grade of D2 forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to issue a revised marks memo by correcting the marks to 23 in Physics Theory subject of Class XII examination 2026 as secured by the 2nd petitioner and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T D PHANI KUMAR 2. AKHIL KRISHNAN CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL RC,J W.P.No.18375 of 2026 3 ORDER The writ petition has been filed questioning the action of the respondents in not issuing correct marks memo being arbitrary, illegal, colourable exercise of power and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. 2. The evaluated answer sheets along with marks awarded to each question of the subjects Physics and Mathematics have been placed before this Court in sealed covers. They have been opened in the chambers in the presence of the student. They perused the evaluated answer sheets and marks awarded and having satisfied the writ petitioner instructed his counsel to pray for closure of the writ petition. Accordingly, the learned counsel for petitioner prayed this Court to close the writ petition. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 5th August, 2026 RR