Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 751 (KAR)

SRI REVANA SIDDAIAH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/31143/2025 · 2026-03-23

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16364 WP No. 31143 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.31143 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI REVANA SIDDAIAH SON OF LATE MANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS RETIRED ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY, M BASAVAIAH RESIDENTIAL COLLEGE, SIRIGERE, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 541 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT ‘SHURU NILAYA’, RAMESHWARANAGARA, 1ST MAIN, CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N JAGADISH BALIGA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, (AIDED INSTITUTE), VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION SHESHADRI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, SHIMOGA- 577 203. 4. THE SECRETARY AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, SRI TARALABALU JAGADGURU VIDYA SAMSTHE (R), Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16364 WP No. 31143 of 2025 SIRIGERE 577 541 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 5. THE PRINCIPAL, M BASAVAIAH RESIDENTIAL COLLEGE, SIRIGERE- 577 541, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-3; SRI. SANDEEP PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R-4 & R-5) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO IMPLEMENT ANNX-A ORDER PASSED BY THE R-3 VIDE ORDER RJDCED315VMK22-23 DATED 12.10.2022 AND ANNX-B DATED 29.10.2022 IN RJDCED315VMK22- 23 AND ANNX-C THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 RJDCED316VVPS 2016-17 SV-1 AS EXPEDITIOUS AS POSSIBLE AND NOT LATER THAN 02 MONTHS ALONG WITH INTEREST ON THE DELAYED PAYMENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “(a) Issue writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction directing the respondents to implement Annexure-A order passed by the 3rd Respondent vide Order RJDCED315VMK22-23 dated 12.10.2022 and Annexure-B dated 29.10.2022 in RJDCED315VMK22-23 and Annexure-C the Order passed by the 2nd Respondent RJDCED316VVPS2016-17SV-1 as expeditious as possible and not later than 02 months along with interest on the delayed payment; and - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16364 WP No. 31143 of 2025 (b) Grant such other and further reliefs deems fit under the circumstances of the case including the cost, in the interests of justice and equity.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5 and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite order at Annexure – C dated 28.05.2018 passed by respondent No.2 and the Communications issued vide Annexures – A and dated 12.10.2022 and 29.10.2022 issued by respondent No.3, respondents are not implementing the aforesaid order and as such, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition. 4. Per contra, learned AGA for respondent Nos.1 to 3 submits that if respondent Nos.4 and 5 submits a proposal, respondent Nos.1 to 3 would consider the same and pass appropriate orders / take appropriate decision, in accordance with law. So also, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 and 5 submits that if reasonable time is given, they would submit a proposal. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16364 WP No. 31143 of 2025 5. In view of the above, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of the petition by issuing certain directions: ORDER (i) The petition is hereby disposed of. (ii) In the first instance, respondent Nos.4 and 5 are directed to submit a proposal in terms of Annexures – A, B and C dated 12.10.2022, 29.10.2022 and 28.05.2018 to respondent Nos.1 to 3 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (iii) Immediately upon receipt of the said proposal, the concerned respondent Nos.1 to 3 are directed to take appropriate decision / pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of two months thereafter. 6. Subject to the aforesaid observations and directions, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 85