Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 751 (ALL)

NEERAJ KUMAR SINGHAI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/5544/2026 · 2026-04-19

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 5544 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Vijay Rajpal, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents. 2. The prayers of this writ petition are not happily worded. Still in the interest of justice, this writ petition is disposed of that in case petitioner files a fresh representation within a period of three weeks from today before Respondent-3 (District Basic Education Officer, Lalitpur) his claim for renewal of his engagement as Part Time Instructor be looked into. However, it is made clear that Court has not expressed any opinion that petitioner has a right for renewal or not. April 20, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sourabh, Vijay Raj Pal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Neeraj Kumar Singhai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad