Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010112242026
2026:UHC:5302 1
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition Criminal No. 1213 of 2026 02 July, 2026
Sumaiyya and Others ……..Petitioners
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand and Others ……Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Himanshu, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Lohan, learned A.G.A. for the State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
The petitioners have approached this Court seeking protection so that they may lead a peaceful life.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record.
3.
According to the petitioners, they belongs the different faith and are in a relationship with each other. It is stated that they have not yet solemnized their marriage on account of continuous threats and apprehension of dire consequences at the hands of the family members of petitioner no.1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners intend to marry each other in accordance with law, but are unable to do so due to the persistent threats allegedly extended by the private respondents
4.
It is further submitted that both the
UKHC010112242026
2026:UHC:5302 2 petitioners have attained the age of majority; that, the date of birth of petitioner no.1 is stated to be 13.05.2004 and that of petitioner no.2 is 12.07.2005, as reflected from their Aadhaar Cards and the High School Mark-sheet of petitioner no.2. He would further submit that although both the petitioners are permanent residents of the State of Uttar Pradesh, however, petitioner no.2 is presently employed with a private company at Bahadrabad, District Haridwar, Uttarakhand and due to his employment, he has been residing in rented accommodation at Bahadrabad. In support of the said contention, learned counsel has placed reliance upon the notarized copy of the rent agreement, which has been brought on record along with the supplementary affidavit.
5.
The petitioners are present before this Court. They submit that both of them are majors, are in love with each other, and intend to solemnize their marriage in accordance with law.
6.
Be that as it may, according to the petitioners, both have attained the age of majority. Documents in support of their age have been placed on record. It is also stated that they are residing together of their own free will.
7.
In view of the above
facts and circumstances, and having regard to the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lata
UKHC010112242026
2026:UHC:5302 3 Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC 475, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners have made out a case for protection of their life and personal liberty.
8.
Accordingly, the Station House Officer, Police Station Bahadrabad, District Haridwar is
directed to assess the threat perception, if any, to the life and liberty of the petitioners and, if such threat is found to exist, to provide necessary and adequate protection to the petitioners in accordance with law. The Station House Officer is further
directed to summon the private respondents and any other persons who may be opposing or interfering with the relationship or proposed marriage of the petitioners and to counsel them strictly in accordance with law, ensuring that no coercion, harassment, or unlawful interference is caused to the petitioners.
9.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
10. Pending applications, if any, also stand
disposed of accordingly.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
02.07.2026 Mamta
MA MTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46 f244f3e584af1449e430ef90 0bf09a6d67ebbd64267132 9b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1 d9cabfd54852c9e68911ca8 b66dd26690a191648ab5d8 dd004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.07.03 11:51:34 +05'30'