APHC010231332026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 12034 OF 2026 Between: 1. PERARAPU SATYANARAYANA, S/o Subba Rao aged 58 years, Occ CEO (Under Suspension) Gandepalli PACS R/o. D.No 2-24, Rajikaveedi, Gandepalli Village and Mandal, East Godavari District ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep.by its Principal Secretary Co-Operation Department, Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District CoOperative Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 3. The Divisional CoOperative Officer, Kakinada,East Godavari District. 4. Gandepalli Primary Agricultural Society Ltd, Gandepalli, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District, Rep by. its Person in Charge. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in reopening enquiry by appointing new enquiry 2 officer and issuing notice dated 24-04-2026 to that effect though the domestic enquiry has already completed and accepted is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently set aside the same and further direct the respondents to release pensionary benefits to the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the orders dated 24-04-2026 passed by the 4th respondent pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to release the pensioner benefits without referring disciplinary proceedings pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES II Counsel for the Respondents:SRINIVAS BASAVA The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No. 12034 of 2026 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent No.4 in reopening enquiry by appointing new enquiry officer and issuing notice, dated 24.04.2026, though the domestic enquiry had already been completed and accepted, is illegal and arbitrary. 2. At the time of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as the Respondents submitted that, in view of the subsequent developments that have taken place, after the filing of the writ petition, no cause survives for adjudication. They accordingly requested that the Writ Petition be closed. 3. Recording the submissions, the Writ Petition is closed. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 06.08.2026 SM 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No. 12034 of 2026 Date: 06.08.2026 SM