Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7504 (JHR)

ULFAAJ ANSARI ALIAS ULFAJ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2841/2026 · 2026-04-30

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12786 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2841 of 2026 Ulfaaj Ansari @ Ulfaj Ansari, son of Majlum Mian … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 06/30.04.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2026 in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, sections 66(B)(C)(D) of the Information Technology Act and section 42(3)(e) of the Telecommunication Act, 2023 , now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that three mobile phones and two SIM cards have been allegedly recovered from the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2026 having no criminal antecedent. He submits that during investigation, three online complaints of the victims have been found, but the statement of only one victim has been recorded. He also submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner are not in dispute. It is further not in dispute that no other case has been instituted against the petitioner. 5. Considering the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted and there is no other criminal case against the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- 2026:JHHC:12786 2 (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.04.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.05.2026