Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 75019 (MAD)

UNION BANK OF INDIA v. The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner(Central)

REV.APPL/225/2024 · 2026-01-23

K Rajasekar, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:376 REV.APPL No. 225 of 2024 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR REV.APPL.No.225 of 2024 Union Bank Of India No.139 , Prakasam Road, Manadi Police Colony, George Town , Chennai ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner(Central) (The Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972), No.26, IIIrd Block 5th Floor, Shastri Bhawan, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006No.139 , Prakasam Road, Manadi Police Colony, George Town , Chennai 2. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (central) DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai 3. M Swaminathan Flat B-15, Doshi Gardens 174, Arcot Road, Vadapalani Chennai ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL No. 225 of 2024 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer: To review the order dated 18-01-2024 passed by thsi Honourable Court in WA No.302/2024. For Petitioner: MRS.T.HEMALATHA ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Learned counsel for the Applicant would submit that there is a Supreme Court order in their favour, which has not been considered by this Court, while deciding the intra Court appeal. 2. Re-adjudication of merits in a review proceedings is impermissible. The scope of Review Application cannot be extended for the purpose of adjudication of grounds on merits. 3. Learned counsel for the Applicant would rely on Paragraph No.10 of the judgment and state that the judgment, in the case of Shambu Sharan Singh vs. CMD, UCO Bank and Others, relied on by this Court is incorrect. Such a ground taken would not constitute an error apparent, warranting exercise of powers of review. The merit of the case has been duly considered by this Court elaborately in respect of other grounds raised by the parties. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL No. 225 of 2024 __________ Page3 of 4 Hence, the present Review Application stands dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 23-01-2026 Index: Yes Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No AR To: 1. The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner(Central) (The Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972), No.26, IIIrd Block 5th Floor, Shastri Bhawan, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006No.139 , Prakasam Road, Manadi Police Colony, George Town , Chennai. 2. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (central) DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis REV.APPL No. 225 of 2024 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND K.RAJASEKAR, J. AR REV.APPL.No.225 of 2024 23-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis