Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7501 (UTT)

DIGVIJAY SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/2029/2020 · 2026-07-01

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010124982020 2026:UHC:5237 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/2029/2020 Digvijay Singh --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. No representation for the petitioner though called twice. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy A.G. for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel would submit that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the charge-sheet has been submitted before the competent court. It is, therefore, contended that the relief sought in the writ petition no longer survives and the petition has consequently become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the criminal writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. 5. No order as to costs. (Alok Mahra, J.) 01-07-2026 mamta