Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7499 (BOM)

AVINASH ASHOKRAO LANDGE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/11303/2026 · 2026-09-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 4-wp 11222-2026+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11222 OF 2026 Sudhir Pandurang Kadam And Another .. Petitioners Versus The State Of Maharashtra Department Of Tribal Development And Another .. Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11302 OF 2026 Narayan Uttamrao Landge .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another .. Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11303 OF 2026 Avinash Ashokrao Landge .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another .. Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11304 OF 2026 Ashok Vishwanath Landge .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another .. Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11305 OF 2026 Uttam Vishwanath Landge .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another .. Respondents 2026:BHC-AUG:40161-DB 2 4-wp 11222-2026+.odt AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11306 OF 2026 Sonali Uttamrao Landge .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another .. Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11307 OF 2026 Deepali Uttamrao Landge .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another .. Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11308 OF 2026 Rahul Ramrao Landge .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another .. Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11309 OF 2026 Madan Laxmanrao Landge .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Another .. Respondents Mr. Sushant C. Yeramwar, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, Mr. S. R. Yadav-Lonikar, Mr. K. N. Lokhande, Smt. S. S. Joshi, Mr. P. S. Patil, Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP’s for Respondents-State in respective matters. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 01st SEPTEMBER, 2026. 3 4-wp 11222-2026+.odt PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned advocate for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners are challenging show cause notices issued by the committee – respondent No. 2 asking the petitioners as to why the cases of petitioners shall not be reopened. The notices are dated 30.07.2026 and 06.08.2026. 3. The learned A.G.P., at the outset, raises the objection that, now the committee is vested with the power to review its own order. The said amendment is brought on the statute book on 22.07.2026 and therefore, from 23.07.2026 onwards the committee has every power to reopen/review the cases. 4. In view of the above, this Court finds that, there is no reason to entertain the petitions. Therefore, the writ petitions stand disposed of. ( JITENDRA JAIN, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) P.S.B.