[2026:RJ-JP:19337] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7968/2026 Narsingh Sharan Sharma S/o Late Shri Hazari Lal Sharma, Age 52 Year, At Present, Posted in the Office of Joint Director, Medical & Health Services, Jaipur Zone, Jaipur on the post of Senior As- sistant, R/o Ward No. 35, Behind Durga Mata Mandir, Govind Vi- har, Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Director, Public Health, Medi- cal & Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. Address- Swasthya Bhawan, A-2, Jamnalal Bajaj Marg, Ashok Na- gar, C-Scheme, Jaipur 2. Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical & Health Services, Ra- jasthan, Jaipur. Address- Swasthya Bhawan, A-2, Jam- nalal Bajaj Marg, Ashok Nagar, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Joint Director, Medical & Health Services, Jaipur Zone, Jaipur. Address- Sethi Colony, Transport Nagar, Jaipur. 4. District Collector & District Magistrate, District Kotputli- Behror. 5. Chief Medical & Health Officer, District Kotputli-Behror. 6. Additional Chief Medical & Health Officer (Family Plan- ning), District Kotputli- Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammed Anees For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was posted as Senior Assistant in the office of the Additional Chief Medical & Health Officer (Family Planning), District Kotputli-Behror. [2026:RJ-JP:19337] (2 of 3) [CW-7968/2026] Counsel submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated in a criminal case, was arrested therein, and was subsequently released on bail on 07.08.2025. Counsel submits that, thereafter, respondent No.2 placed the petitioner under suspension vide order dated 13.08.2025 under the provisions of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958, and during the period of suspension, the petitioner was attached to the office of respondent No.3. Counsel submits that the petitioner submitted a representation dated 03.12.2025 seeking reinstatement on the ground that more than three months had elapsed since the order of suspension; however, the respondents neither replied to, nor decided the said representation. It is also submitted that the petitioner thereafter sent a notice for demand of justice to the respondents on 02.04.2026, but no satisfactory action has been taken by the respondents for redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.2 and the respondent No.2 may be directed to dispose of his representation at the earliest in accordance with law. 3. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with direction to the petitioner to file fresh representation before respondent No.2. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the [2026:RJ-JP:19337] (3 of 3) [CW-7968/2026] respondent No.2 by way of passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of two months from the date of its receipt along with certified copy of this order. It is also directed that respondent No.2 shall intimate the petitioner about the fate of the representation filed by him. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the representation independently and strictly in accordance with law. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /26