Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7492 (JHR)

SALAMAT ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2461/2026 · 2026-04-29

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12586 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2461 of 2026 Salamat Ansari, S/O- Abdul Sakur Ansari @ Abdul Sakur … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --- 03/29.04.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2026 in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026 registered under sections 111(2)(b), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, sections 66(b), 66(c) and 66(d) of Information Technology Act and under section 42(3)(e) of the Telecommunication Act, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that three mobile phones and three SIM cards have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and only one victim could be identified which is mentioned at paragraph 75 of the case-diary. He also submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and has submitted that out of the three, two SIM cards were in the name of the petitioner and one SIM card was in the name of another person. 5. To this, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2026 and charge-sheet has already been submitted. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, the petitioner is directed to be 2026:JHHC:12586 2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:29.04.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:30.04.2026