Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7490 (JHR)

SONU KUMAR YADAV ALIAS SONU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2419/2026 · 2026-04-29

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:12625 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.2419 of 2026 ------ Sonu Kumar Yadav @ Sonu Kumar, aged about 24 years, S/o Rajdeo Rai, R/o Anand Puri, Harmu, Ranchi, Doranda, P.O.-Harmu, P.S.- Argora, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Nisha Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated- 29-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No.52 of 2026 (N) registered for the offences punishable under Section 21(b), 22 & 29 of NDPS Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused person namely Ajay Yadav was in illegal possession of 61.19 gm of brown sugar also known as heroine and out of the same, 43.85 gm of brown sugar was recovered from the petitioner. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the seized brown sugar comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-11 of this bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.02.2026 as is evident from para-09 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, NDPS, Ranchi in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No.52 of 2026 (N) with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 29/04/2026 Abhiraj/