Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7488 (BOM)

VAISHALI SATISH KOLTE v. THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER MAGISTRATE BHOKARDAN AND OTHERS

CA/9224/2026 · 2026-09-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 974-CA-9224-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 974 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9224 OF 2026 IN WP/5676/2026 Vaishali Satish Kolte VERSUS The Sub Divisional Officer Magistrate Bhokardan And Others ... Mr. Vaidya Ameet Raveendra for the Applicant. Ms. Meenakshi Sangit, AGP for the Respondent/State. ... CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 01.09.2026 PER COURT : 1. The Application is for recall of order passed by this Court dated 3rd July, 2026. It is stated that the order has been passed by this Court directing that the steps shall be taken within a period of four weeks by the respective Petitioners, failing which, the matter shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. 2. The learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has failed to take steps against the Respondent No.15, therefore, the order impugned came to be passed. According to him, Respondent No.15 is a formal party, not necessary for adjudication of the Writ Petition. Hence, he seeks deletion of Respondent No.15. 3. In view of the averments made in the application, the Civil Application is allowed in terms of Prayer Clauses [B] and [C]. Sunny Thote 2026:BHC-AUG:40277 2 974-CA-9224-2026.odt 4. Accordingly, the Civil Application is disposed off. [ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ] Sunny Thote