AKASH KUMAR SINGH ALIAS LALU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3348/2026 · 2026-04-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7483 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7483 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:11924 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3348 of 2026
------ Akash Kumar Singh @ Lalu, aged about 22 years, S/o Arbind Singh, R/o Laxmi Nagar, Road No.01, Plot No.06, P.O. & P.S.-Telco, Town- Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 22-04-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.147 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 25(1-B)(a)/26/35 of Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of a pistol with live cartridges. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the fire arm was recovered from the co-accused Raj Singh Kashyap @ Kodu and Rajesh Giri @ Dantu. It is next submitted that petitioner was also instrumental in firing upon the house of Hareram Singh for demanding extortion. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is next submitted that the petitioner was not present in the alleged place of occurrence. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.01.2026 as is evident from para- 01 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No.147 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22/04/2026 Abhiraj/