[2026:RJ-JP:21261] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6631/2026 Ratnya @ Ratan @ Ramratan S/o Ramchandra Banjara, R/o Nimdiya, Surjanpur, Police Station Narayanpur, District Alwar. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur.) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through its Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Uday Shankar Acharya for Mr. Uma Shankar Acharya Ms. Nidhi Suwalka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 20/05/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 154/2020 registered at Police Station Andhi, District Jaipur Rural for offence(s) under Sections 149, 336 & 395 of IPC and Sections 3 & 25 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present matter pertains to bail jump. After getting benefit of bail, the petitioner was regularly attending the Court but due to unavoidable circumstances, he could not appear before the learned Trial Court on the concerned date and as such, on 24.05.2023, his bail bonds were forfeited. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.04.2026. Learned counsel also undertakes that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date as fixed by [2026:RJ-JP:21261] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6631/2026] the Court and the petitioner shall not make any attempt to jump the bail again, therefore, in the interest of justice, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and also the undertaking of the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date as fixed by the learned Trial Court. Hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Ratnya @ Ratan @ Ramratan S/o Ramchandra Banjara is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:21261] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6631/2026] 8. It is made clear that in case of further misuse of liberty of bail, subsequent prayer of bail on behalf of petitioner shall not be considered. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 44/SHIVANI