- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14322 WP No. 9499 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 9499 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SMT. NALANI, W/O. LATE. RAJU. P, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT.NO.172/2, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH "E" CROSS, SRINIVASAPPA LAYOUT, CHIKKABANASWADI POST, BENGALURU-560 043. (PETITIONER IS NOT CLAIMING SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFITS) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DEEPAK. M, ADVOCATE) AND: THE BANGALORE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, HAVING ITS REGISTERED O/AT. NO.03, PAMPA MAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJAPET, BENGALURU-560 018. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-D I.E. LETTER NO.BCCB/AO/930/2024-25 DATED 17/01/2025 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14322 WP No. 9499 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayers: "WHEREFORE, the petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to: a. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing the "ANNEXURE- D" i.e., Letter.No.BCCB/AO/930/2024-25 dated 17/01/2025, b. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing the E- Auction held by the respondent bank as void, C. Grant such other relief as tis Hon'ble Court deems just and equitable in the circumstances of the case." 2. The writ petition is of the year 2025. So far, no notice has not been issued to the respondent. When the matter came up on 17.02.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was posted on 25.02.2026. Again the matter came up on 25.02.2026, there - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:14322 WP No. 9499 of 2025 was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and directed that matter to be listed on 09.03.2026. 3. On 09.03.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court had directed the matter to be listed for 'dismissal' on 10.03.2026. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20