Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7480 (GAU)

NANDINI DUTTA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/1905/2022 · 2026-06-04

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010050502022 2026:GAU-AS:7849 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1905/2022 NANDINI DUTTA W/O NRIPEN DUTTA, GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE MILES BRONSON EDUCATION SOCIETY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT VIP ROAD, AZARA, GUWAHATI-15, KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR-CUM-MEMBER SECRETARY, HARYANA MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL-CUM-DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, HARYANA 30 BAYS BUILDING, SECTOR 17 CHANDIGARH, PUNJAB, PIN- 122001 2:SATISH AHLAWAT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (RETD.) SOLE ARBITRATOR HOUSE NO W-7/12 DLF PHASE-III GURGAON-122001 (HARYANA) 3:ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE GURUGRAM HARYANA-122001 4:STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE TAXATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 Page No.# 2/3 5:TAPIO YFM DESIGNS PVT. LTD. PLOT NO. 5430 PACE CITY-2 SECTOR 37 GURUGRAM-122001 HARYANA 6:STATE BANK OF INDIA GUWAHATI AIRPORT BRANCH BORJHAR GUWAHATI-1 DIST-KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 7:THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK YADAV BHAWAN OLD RAILWAY ROAD GURUGRAM (MAIN BRACH OFFICE AT PANBAZAR GUWAHATI KAMRUP ASSAM 78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D P CHALIHA, MS M ROY,MD R ALI,MR L P SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, MR. A DHANUKA (R-7),MR. A GANGULY(R- 7),MR B DAS (R-6),MR G JALAN (R-6) BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE O R D E R Date : 05.06.2026. Heard Mr. D.P. Chaliha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. M. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that he has an instruction to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to pursue the statutory remedy and till the petitioner approaches the appropriate authority, the impugned award and Page No.# 3/3 attachment order may not be given effect to. Ms. I. Kumari, learned counsel is present on behalf of Mr. G. Jalan, learned counsel for the respondent No.6 is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal, with the liberty as prayed for. In the interest of justice, the impugned award as well as the attachment order shall not be given effect till the petitioner approaches the appropriate authority within 25 (twenty five) days. JUDGE Comparing Assistant