Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 748 (JHR)

RAMNIWAS YADAV ALIAS PAGAL YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1041/2026 · 2026-03-20

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8180 1 A.B.A. No. 1041 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 1041 of 2026 ---- Ramniwas Yadav @ Pagal Yadav, aged about 51 years, son of Radha Kishun Yadav, resident of Mirzapur PO Manihari, PS Manihari, District Katihar, Bihar .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Rohit Kumar, aged about 36 years, son of Ram Naresh Prasad, resident of Krishna Niketan, Baddipara, PO Jamalpur, PS East Colony, Jamalpur, Dist Munger, Bihar 811 214, resently residing at C/o Prakash Chandra Yadav, at Netajee Subhash Colony, PO Sahibganj, PS Jirwabari (OP) Dist. Sahibganj, Jharkhand 816 109 .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sudhanshu Kr Singh, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Advocate ---- 2/20.03.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sahibganj (M) P.S Case No.91 of 2021, for offence registered under section 395, 397, 341, 504, 506 and 120(B) of the IPC, pending in court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is made that the petitioner was carrying pistol and demanding collection money from the Manager of the informant. He next submits that so far as the demand is concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations against the all accused persons and Bhim Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail against whom the allegation of demand of money is there in ABA No.8535 of 2023 by the coordinate Bench and other persons have also been 2026:JHHC:8180 2 A.B.A. No. 1041 of 2026 provided privilege of anticipatory bail in ABA No.8398 of 2023, ABA No.8593 of 2023 and ABA No.8480 of 2023. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that allegations against the petitioner is there of demand of money. 5. Looking to the contents of the FIR, it transpires that that the main allegation is there against Bhim Yadav, Rohit Yadav and Bachu Yadav, however, the said Bhim Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABA and others have also been provided privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforesaid ABAs, and in the attending facts and circumstances of the instant case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj, in connection with Sahibganj (M) P.S Case No.91 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 20.03.2026 SI/