APHC010172262026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 8954/2026 Between: 1. PARCHA DIVAKARA SUDHASREE, W/O RAGHAVA RAO AGED ABOUT 58, OCC VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER R/O PENUGANCHIPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL NTR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TAHSILDAR, PENUGANCHIPROLU MANDAL NTR DISTRICT 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 in not issuing the No Objection Letter and Leave Sanction Order to the petitioner for submitting the Visa application to the US Embassy on the ground of pendency of the criminal case in FIR No.79/2025 on the file of Penuganchiprolu police station, NTR District as arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent 2 No.1 to issue No Objection Letter and Leave Sanction Letter to the petitioner without reference of pendency of the criminal case in FIR No.79/2025 on the file of Penuganchiprolu police station, NTR District in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.1 to issue No Objection Letter and Leave Sanction Letter to the petitioner without reference of pendency of the criminal case in FIR No.79/2025 on the file of Penuganchiprolu police station, NTR District pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to file fresh Writ Petition based on the cause of action. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn by granting liberty to file fresh Writ Petition based on the cause of action. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 21.4.2026 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.8954 OF 2026 21.4.2026 RD