IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10489 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-412 Year-2025 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Sahindra Rai @ Sahindra Prasad Yadav Son of Daroga Rai Resident of village- Bhaluihi, Ps- Marhaura, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 2 12-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Marhaura P.S. Case No. 412 of 2025 lodged on15.06.2025, for the offences punishable under sections 12(2), 115(2), 303(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against eight named accused persons including the present petitioner. There is a specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted the victim with a sword, due to which the victim sustained injuries and became unconscious. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. It is further Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10489 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/3 submitted that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner and the informant are pattidars and are closely related agnates. There has been a long- standing land dispute between the parties. It is further submitted that there is a case and counter-case between the parties arising out of the same date and place of occurrence, in which scuffling took place between both sides. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail; however, he concedes that the petitioner has a clean antecedent. He further submits that from the F.I.R. and the order of the learned trial court it transpires that the injury caused to the victim is grievous in nature. However, he fairly submits that both the petitioner and the informant are agnates and the dispute appears to have arisen out of a long-standing land dispute between them. 6. In the facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of ₹30000/- (thirty thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1) (d) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with the aforesaid Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10489 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 3/3 case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and with further condition that (i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide; and (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds by the Trial Court itself. Ashwini/- (Dr. Anshuman, J) U T