Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7472 (ORI)

HRUDANANDA MISHRA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/11749/2026 · 2026-04-23

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C ) No.11749 of 2026 Hrudananda Mishra …. Petitioner Mr. D.K. Panda, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC COROM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 23.04.2026 2. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties particularly Opp. Party No.1 to allow his annual increments w.e.f dt.01.12.2010 onwards as due and admissible, increased subsistence allowance@75% w.e.f.dt.01.12.2011 to dt. 15.03.2013 and fixation of pay in ORSP Rules, 2017 till his retirement on superannuation and revised his provisional pension accordingly with payment of arrears thereto at an early date as he had retired from service on 31.06.2022. And pass any other order(s) or issue direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the Bonafide interest of justice. And for which act of kindness, the Petitioner as in duty bound, shall ever pray. p. 2 p. 2 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of 3(three) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge sangita