UKHC010125452020 2026:UHC:5239 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/2040/2020 Devendra Singh --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Ankush Singhal proxy counsel for Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy A.G. for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel would submit that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the charge-sheet has been submitted before the competent court. It is, therefore, contended that the relief sought in the writ petition no longer survives and the petition has consequently become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid factual position. 5. Since the charge-sheet has been filed, the criminal writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. 6. No order as to costs. 7. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mahra, J.) 01-07-2026 mamta