Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7470 (JHR)

AJAY KEWAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2861/2026 · 2026-04-30

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:12787 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2861 of 2026 Ajay Kewat, Son of Sahdeo Kewat … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Pd. Deo, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, APP --- 03/30.04.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 29.01.2026 in connection with Deodanr P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026, registered under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 111 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(C) and 66(D) of Information Technology Act, now pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M, Godda. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that one mobile, one SIM card and two ATM cards are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner with cash of Rs. 15,000/-. However, no victim has been identified. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 29.01.2026. He also submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer, but does not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge-sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M, Godda in connection with Deodanr P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the 2026:JHHC:12787 2 petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:30.04.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:01.05.2026