Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 747 (JHR)

RAJU PRASAD SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7547/2025 · 2026-01-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:454 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.7547 of 2025 Raju Prasad Singh, Aged about 42 Years, Son of Rajendra Prasad Singh, R/O- village Kangoi Ramnagar, Mihijam, P.O & P.S- Mihijam, District - Jamtara. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Pd. Johshi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, APP ------ 2/09.01.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mihijam P.S Case No.66 of 2025, registered for the offence under sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2) of the B.N.S 2023, pending in the Court learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegations are made of taking the money for facilitating the loan in favour of the informant. He also submits that the said allegation made of taking money is against Mitilesh Srivastav, Gopal Dubey and Kamlesh Srivastav. He also submits that nothing has been taken by this petitioner and only in the last line of the FIR, the name of the petitioner has been stated. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that it appears that the petitioner is the associate of Mitilesh Srivastav, Gopal Dubey and Kamlesh Srivastav. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that allegation of taking money is there against Mitilesh Srivastav, Gopal Dubey 2026:JHHC:454 2 and Kamlesh Srivastav and allegation of taking money is not against the petitioner and only, in last line of the FIR, the name of the petitioner has been stated. In view of the above, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of his surrender / arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara, in connection with Mihijam P.S case No. 66 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 09.01.2026 R.Kumar