Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 747 (AP)

Yakkati Omsri Venkatesh, v. Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS,

CC/398/2026 · 2026-04-09

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010047362026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 398/2026 Between: 1. YAKKATI OMSRI VENKATESH,, S/O RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,R/O 4-6, KATTEMPUDI VILLAGE PONNUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. MRS SATYANARAYANA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. MR S KRISHNA MURTHY, .THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ANDHRA PRADESH STATE KAPU WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., 12-467, 3RD FLOOR, POTHURI MERCANTILE, NH-16 SERVICE ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent Under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willfully, deliberately and intentional violation of the orders of this Honble Court, dated 19.11.2025 passed in W.P.No.26938 of 2025, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AJITH KUMAR SINGU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. U KANAKA RAJU The Court made the following Order: The present Contempt Case has been filed by the petitioner seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience in complying with the order dated 19.11.2025 in W.P.No.26938 of 2025. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, on written instructions, submits that the payment has been made to the petitioner herein to a tune of Rs.5,00,000/- on 31.03.2026. The written instructions are placed on record. 3. In view of the said reasons, no further orders are necessary to be passed in this Contempt Case and accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J Date:10.04.2026 MJA 74 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 398/2026 Date:10.04.2026 MJA