[2026:JHHC:12619] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.855 of 2022 ------ 1. Saheblal Mahato, aged about 62 years, 2. Kalicharan Mahato, aged about 56 years, 3. Bhola Mahato, aged about 53 years, No. 1 to 3 all are the Sons of Ruplal Mahato 4. Babulal Mahato, aged about 46 years, Son of Ritalal Mahato, 5. Mukesh Kumar Mahato, aged about 30 years, Son of Sristidhar Mahato, 6. Ganesh Chandra Mahato, aged about 28 years, Son of Sristidhar Mahato, 7. Atul Chandra Mahato, aged about 63 years, Son of Rati Lal Mahto No. 1 to 7 all are Resident of Village- Palani, P.O.- Palani, P.S.- Baliapur, Dist.- Dhanbad. 8. Lalit Mahato, aged about 56 years, Son of Jyoti Mahato, Resident of Naya Tola, Village- Pargha, P.O. – Pargha, P.S. – Baliapur, Dist.- Dhanbad. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. – Dhurwa, Dist.- Ranchi. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S. – Dhanbad, Dist.- Dhanbad. 3. The Circle Officer, Baliapur, P.O. & P.S.- Baliapur, Dist.- Dhanbad. 4. Chhatradhari Agarwalla, Son of Late Chandgi Ram Agarwalla, 5. Madanlal Sao, Son of Panchanan Sao, No. 4 & 5 Resident of Village- Damodarpur, P.O.- Damodarpur, P.S. – Dhanbad, Dist.- Dhanbad. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, AG ------ Order No:-05 Dated:-29-04-2026 Heard the parties. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the State submits that since there is no merit in this Civil Miscellaneous Petition, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in pursuing this Civil Miscellaneous Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for default of the petitioners. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 29.04.2026 Saroj/