VIJAY SHANKAR SINGH ALIAS BABLU TAPAR ALIAS BABLU SINGH ALIAS BIJAY SHANKAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3362/2026 · 2026-04-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7466 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7466 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:11988] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3362 of 2026
------ Vijay Shankar Singh @ Bablu Tapar @ Bablu Singh @ Bijay Shankar Singh, aged about 25 years, Son of Late Krishna Singh, resident of Gowala Patti, Kitadih, P.O. and P.S. Parsudih, Town Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Prathik, Advocate
Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate.
For the State
: Mrs. Mohua Palit, A.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 22-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 458 of 2025 arising out of Bagbera P.S. Case No. 70 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1248 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 118(2) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co- accused persons has committed murder of the brother of the informant namely Ashish Kumar Bhagat. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the restatement of the informant in para-02 and the witnesses in their respective statements recorded under section 180 of the BNSS, 2023 have supported the case of the prosecution to the effect that, the co-accused namely Rahul Yadav after taking out a pistol from his vest and shot the deceased. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.07.2025 as mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Jamshedpur in connection with S.T. Case No. 458 of 2025 arising out of Bagbera P.S. Case No. 70 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1248 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22/04/2026 Amar/