Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7466 (GAU)

MR PRABHU KUMAR PODDAR v. SMT INDU JAIN

I.A.(Civil)/1160/2026 · 2026-06-04

Kalyan Rai Surana

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010071532026 2026:GAU-AS:7913 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1160/2026 MR PRABHU KUMAR PODDAR SON OF LATE PRABHU KUMAR PODDAR, R/O OF PODDAR BHAWAN, MALIGAON, BARA BAZAR, PANDU, JALUKBARI, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM VERSUS SMT INDU JAIN WIFE OF LATE PADAM JAIN, R/O AK AZAD ROAD, PALTAN BAZAR, REHABARI, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M L PANDIA, Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : CRP(IO)/60/2026 PRABHU KUMAR PODDAR SON OF LATE K.D. PODDAR RESIDENT OF PODDAR BHAWAN MALIGAON BARA BAZAR P.O.-PANDU P.S.- JALUKBARI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS SMT. INDU JAIN WIFE OF LATE PADAM JAIN RESIDENT OF A.K. AZAD ROAD P.S.- PALTAN BAZAR REHABARI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. M L PANDIA Advocate for : appearing for SMT. INDU JAIN BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 05.06.2026 Heard Mr. M.L Pandia, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. It is submitted that there is typographical error in the cause-title of the connected CRP(IO)60/2026. 3. In the connected application, the applicant is assailing the order dated 16.01.2025 and 18.11.2025. However, in the cause-title date is incorrectly mentioned as 10.01.2015 instead of 16.01.2025. 4. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to submit the amended cause-title in view of the inadvertent mistake. Page No.# 3/3 5. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant