Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010071532026
2026:GAU-AS:7913
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1160/2026 MR PRABHU KUMAR PODDAR SON OF LATE PRABHU KUMAR PODDAR, R/O OF PODDAR BHAWAN, MALIGAON, BARA BAZAR, PANDU, JALUKBARI, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM VERSUS SMT INDU JAIN WIFE OF LATE PADAM JAIN, R/O AK AZAD ROAD, PALTAN BAZAR, REHABARI, KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M L PANDIA, Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : CRP(IO)/60/2026 PRABHU KUMAR PODDAR SON OF LATE K.D. PODDAR RESIDENT OF PODDAR BHAWAN MALIGAON BARA BAZAR P.O.-PANDU P.S.- JALUKBARI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS SMT. INDU JAIN WIFE OF LATE PADAM JAIN RESIDENT OF A.K. AZAD ROAD P.S.- PALTAN BAZAR REHABARI DISTRICT- KAMRUP (METRO) ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. M L PANDIA Advocate for : appearing for SMT. INDU JAIN
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 05.06.2026 Heard Mr. M.L Pandia, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. It is submitted that there is typographical error in the cause-title of the connected CRP(IO)60/2026.
3. In the connected application, the applicant is assailing the order dated 16.01.2025 and 18.11.2025. However, in the cause-title date is incorrectly mentioned as 10.01.2015 instead of 16.01.2025.
4. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to submit the amended cause-title in view of the inadvertent mistake.
Page No.# 3/3
5. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant