VINODA DEVI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/38042/2026 · 2026-09-16
Saurabh Srivastava
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7465 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7465 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38042 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for parties.
2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 5.8.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 20.8.2025 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate-IV, Prayagraj as well as entire proceedings of Case no. 345 of 2025 (State of U.P. vs. Vinoda Devi and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 0084 of 2023, under Sections 325, 323, 504 IPC, P.S.- Phoolpur, District Prayagraj.
3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order, chargesheet and entire proceeding, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and apply for bail and if there is no other legal impediment before court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Singh, Ravendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinoda Devi And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
concerned, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).
7. However, it is made clear that till four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. September 17, 2026 Shaswat NA528 No. 38042 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad