Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7460 (PNJ)

GRAM PANCHAYAT ISMAILPUR v. VINEET KUMAR GARG, IFS

COCP/951/2026 · 2026-04-09

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[223] Gram Panc and Distric Vineet Kum Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] 08.04.2026 has been su [2] required to However, l against the [3] disposed of 09.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA COCP-951 Date of De Panchayat Ismailpur, Tehsil istrict Ambala versus et Kumar Garg, IPS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Dr. Malkiat Singh, Advocate Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, H **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State Counsel has pro .2026 in Court today. The same is t een supplied to the counsel representin In view of the compliance ired to be passed. The present cont ever, liberty is granted to the petitione st the said speaking order, in accordan All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 951-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 09.04.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN cate and Mr. Narinder Sindher, G, Haryana. as produced compliance report dated e is taken on record. Copy thereof esenting the petitioner. iance made, no further orders are t contempt petition is disposed off titioner to avail appropriate remedies cordance with law, if so advised. eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No dated ereof s are off. edies tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.10 14:11 I agree to specified portions of this document