GRAM PANCHAYAT ISMAILPUR v. VINEET KUMAR GARG, IFS
COCP/951/2026 · 2026-04-09
Pankaj Jain
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7460 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7460 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[223]
Gram Panc and Distric
Vineet Kum
Coram :
Present:
PANKAJ J
[1]
08.04.2026 has been su [2] required to However, l against the [3]
disposed of
09.04.2026 ‘R. Sharma'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA
COCP-951 Date of De
Panchayat Ismailpur, Tehsil istrict Ambala
versus et Kumar Garg, IPS
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA
Dr. Malkiat Singh, Advocate Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Paramjeet Singh, DAG, H ****
KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Learned State Counsel has pro .2026 in Court today. The same is t een supplied to the counsel representin
In view of the compliance ired to be passed. The present cont ever, liberty is granted to the petitione st the said speaking order, in accordan
All pending miscellaneous ed off.
.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned
Whether reportable
T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 951-2026 (O&M) of Decision : 09.04.2026
…Petitioner
….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN cate and Mr. Narinder Sindher, G, Haryana. as produced compliance report dated e is taken on record. Copy thereof esenting the petitioner. iance made, no further orders are t contempt petition is disposed off titioner to avail appropriate remedies cordance with law, if so advised. eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE
: Yes/No : Yes/No
dated ereof s are off. edies tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.04.10 14:11 I agree to specified portions of this document