[2026:RJ-JP:11147] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3352/2026 Karan Soni S/o Rajendra Soni, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 22, Near Children School, Hanumangarh Town, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan- 335513. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Reserve Bank Of India, Through Its Governor, 4Th Floor, Amar Building Sir Pm Road, Mumbai. 2. The Branch Manager, Indusind Bank, Branch Jaipur, Office At Sangam Complex, Gr.flr. Church Road, Jaipur 302001, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Harshita Singhal and Ms. Neha Sharma for Mr. Vineet Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 16/03/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- “ In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to: (a) to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction to the respondent Bank for releasing the bank Account bearing No. 189509550750 of the petitioner immediately. (b) pass any such other order or orders as may be deemed fit by this Hon’ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case in the favour of the petitioner and to grant heavy cost for the harassment caused to petitioner.” [2026:RJ-JP:11147] (2 of 4) [CW-3352/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has never misused the aforesaid bank account for the purpose of illegal transactions and has not committed any cyber crime and has no relation whatsoever to the alleged fraudulent transaction(s). 3. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the Investigating Agencies and will appear before the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies as and when called upon. 4. Therefore, learned counsel prays that while the disputed amount which has been received in the petitioner's account may be frozen, the amount other than the disputed amount may kindly be allowed to be withdrawn and the petitioner may be allowed to operate and carry out the banking transactions from the said bank account. 5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent – Bank has made a submission at the bar that according to the information received by her the disputed amount is Rs.1,350/- and the bank account of the petitioner has been frozen strictly in compliance of financial cyber fraud complaint(s). 6. Learned counsel for the respondent – Bank further submits that the petitioner may be directed not to discontinue the bank account until the investigation is completed or the criminal case is decided. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees with the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent – Bank. 8. Heard learned counsel for the parties. [2026:RJ-JP:11147] (3 of 4) [CW-3352/2026] 9. In view of the submissions so made, this Court is of the considered view that merely because a certain amount has been transferred to the petitioner's bank account in an alleged fraudulent transaction, the act of freezing the entire bank account and imposing complete restriction on banking transactions at this stage will seriously prejudice the rights of the petitioner. At the most, the Bank can keep a lien on the amount to the extent it relates to the alleged fraudulent transaction(s) credited in the petitioner’s bank account. 10. Consequently, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent – Bank to de-freeze the bank account No. 189509550750 of the petitioner maintained at the IndusInd Bank, Branch Jaipur, Office at Sangam Complex, GR.FLR. Church Road, Jaipur 302001, Rajasthan, and the petitioner may be allowed to operate and carry out banking transactions in the said bank account over and above the disputed amount, in accordance with law. However, the disputed amount i.e., Rs.1,350/- which has been credited in the petitioner’s bank account in connection with the alleged fraudulent transaction(s) shall remain frozen. 11. It is made clear that the petitioner will co-operate with the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies and will appear before them as and when required. It is also ordered that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue the bank account till the Investigating Agencies and Bank Authorities permit the petitioner to do so. 12. It is further ordered that after investigation, if the involvement of the petitioner is found in any illegal transaction, the petitioner shall be liable to pay amount involved in the [2026:RJ-JP:11147] (4 of 4) [CW-3352/2026] aforesaid illegal transaction and will face inquiry/investigation as per law. 13. Needless to say, that this order has been passed only in the context of de-freezing of the bank account of the petitioner and in no manner is to be construed as any determination with respect to the merits of the financial cyber fraud complaint under question. 14. Additionally, it is directed that the petitioner shall ensure that all the compliances required for maintaining and operating his bank account with the respondent – Bank are duly complied with. 15. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIPESH CHAYAL /45