Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7459 (RAJ)

JASRAM S/O RAMLAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6738/2026 · 2026-05-04

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:18806] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6738/2026 Jasram S/o Ramlal, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Vijaypura Police Station Rawanjna Dungar District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain Mr. Durgesh Kumar jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 04/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 1/2026 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawaimadhopur for the offences under Sections 121(1), 132, 352, 324(3), 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(S) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that injuries caused to injured were found to be simple blunt in nature and there is no dangerous to life injury. Other co- accused Deepak @ Deepu has already been enlarged on bail by co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 17.04.2026 passed in SB Criminal Misc second bail application No. 5824/2026 and case of the petitioner is akin to other co-accused, who has already been enlarged on bail. The accused-petitioner is in [2026:RJ-JP:18806] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6738/2026] custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The charge-sheet has already been submitted before the concerned trial court, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the injuries caused to injured were found to be simple blunt in nature and other similarly placed co- accused Deepak @ Deepu has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 17.04.2026 passed in SB Criminal Misc second bail application No. 5824/2026. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Jasram S/o Ramlal, in connection with FIR No. 1/2026 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawaimadhopur shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /67