- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11882 RSA No. 2077 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2077 OF 2023 (PAR/DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PUTTACHANNAMMA D/O LATE SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT DEVAIAHNAHUNDI VILLAGE, SRIRAMPURA DHAKLE, KASABA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT 570008 2. SMT NINGAMMA W/O SRI MAHADEVA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.62, 18TH CROSS, JAYANAGARA, MYSURU 570014. 3. SMT GOWRAMMA W/O LATE CHANDRAPPA D/O LATE SIDDAIAH @ SIDDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.471, SREE CHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE, MAIN ROAD, MAHADEVAPURA, MYSURU 570019. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. BASAVARAJU., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11882 RSA No. 2077 of 2023 AND: 1. MRS. ARIFA SULTHANA W/O MUMTAZ AHMED SIDDIQUI, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO.2306, 7TH CROSS, BASAVESHWARA ROAD, K R MOHALLA, MYSURU 570024 2. SRI MALLANNA S/O SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 3. SRI SWAMY S/O SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 4. SRI SIDDALINGAIAH S/O LATE SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE R/AT DEVAIAHNAHUNDI VILLAGE, SRIRAMPURA DAKHLE KASABA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT 570008. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 R/W. ORDER XLII RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.01.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.890/2016 ON THE FILE OF VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.09.2016 PASSED IN OS NO.207/1996 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSURU. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11882 RSA No. 2077 of 2023 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for appellants. 2. Though matter was adjourned at instance of appellants, on request for filing better affidavit, however, on payment of cost, though better affidavit is filed, cost is not paid. It is apparent that appellants are dilating matter. Hence, Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. In view of disposal of appeal, pending interlocutory applications stand disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2