Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010373142026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE 6th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6063/2026 Between:
1. KATHULA KISHORE, S/O. KONDAIAHAGED 36 YEARS, R/O.
BANDAPLEM,KANDUKUR TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Station House Officer, Kandukur Town Police Station,Prakasam District, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER:
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.19 on bail in Crime No.64 of 2026 of Kandukur Town Police Station, Prakasam District, registered for the alleged
2 offences punishable under Sections 8(c) read with 20(b)(ii)(A) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’). 2. Mr.Koti Reddy Idamakanti, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence and has been falsely implicated by the police. It is further submitted that the Petitioner is the sole earning member of the family and, therefore, his incarceration would cause undue hardship to his dependents. The Petitioner undertakes to strictly adhere to any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, it is urged to allow the Petition. 3. Per contra, Mr.A.Sai Rohith, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner, submitting that the investigation is still underway and several material witnesses remain to be examined. It is contended that if the Petitioner is released on bail at this stage, there is a strong likelihood that he may abscond, thereby hampering the ongoing investigation and evading the process of law and urged to dismiss the Petition. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 5. On perusal of the record, the Petitioner is arraigned as Accused No.19 in this case. The allegation against the Petitioner is that he was indulging in dealing with 1.1 kgs of ganja along with the other accused. So far, 13 witnesses have been examined. There are no similar adverse criminal
3 antecedents reported against the Petitioner. The Petitioner was arrested on
22.06.2026.
He has been in judicial custody for the past 45 days. No application was filed seeking custodial interrogation of the Petitioner. Substantial portion of the investigation with regard to the alleged role played by the Petitioner concerned has been completed. The Petitioner is a permanent resident of Kandukur Town, Prakasam District. He has got fixed abode. If the Petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to stringent conditions, there is no likelihood of her interfering with the investigation, threatening the witnesses, or tampering with the evidence. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of allegations levelled against the Petitioner/Accused No.19, this Court is inclined to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.19 on bail with some stringent conditions. 7. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent conditions: i. The Petitioner/Accused No.19 shall be enlarged on bail subject to him executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kandukur. ii. The Petitioner/Accused No.19 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned, on every Saturday in between 10:00 am and 05:00 pm, till filing of the charge sheet. 4 iii. The Petitioner/Accused No.19 shall not leave the limits of the Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the Station House Officer concerned. iv. The Petitioner/Accused No.19 shall not commit or indulge in commission of any offence in future. v. The Petitioner/Accused No.19 shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer in further investigation of the case and shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required. vi. The Petitioner/Accused No.19 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court. vii.
The Petitioner/Accused No.19 shall surrender his passport, if any, to the investigating officer. If he claims that he does not have passport, he shall submit an affidavit to that effect to the Investigating Officer. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 06.08.2026 Note: Issue C.C. by today
B/o
PRA
5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6063 of 2026
Date: 06.08.2026 Note: Issue C.C. by today
B/o
PRA